About Me

Name:James Broadwater
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 

The Mandatory HPV Vaccine in Texas

Originally published at http://jamesbroadwater.blogspot.com on Feb. 6, 2007.

This past Friday, February 2, 2007, the Governor of Texas, Rick Perry, issued an executive order requiring all girls, upon entering the sixth grade - or, at about age 11 - to be immunized against HPV, or the human papilloma virus. Governor Perry and I are both Republicans, but he is not the first member of my own political party with whom I have found myself in vehement disagreement.

While HPV does cause cervical cancer, HPV is transmitted through sexual contact. A better course of action for Texas to take, rather than mandating more immunizations for the children of their state, is to work for abstinence until marriage, and fidelity within marriage, with it being understood that marriage is for as long as both the man and his wife shall live, preparing couples for marriage, and discontinuing the easy divorce which shatters families, many times plunges the women and children of divorce into poverty, and harms children most of all, psychologically, emotionally, and spiritually. Forcing these immunizations on girls, not yet even women, and even against their will, is sending them the message, "Yes, we do believe the very worst in you, that you are going to be promiscuous, we do believe that you will commit fornication - having sex without being married (for you who have never heard that word, maybe because it hasn't been used, even in church, for far too long), and we are going to forcibly immunize you so that at least, maybe, you won't get one certain disease among many that you may likely get if you engage in this behavior." This executive order goes against the Biblical commands to teach our children to walk in the ways of the Lord, to promote personal and corporate holiness in our people, to believe the best that you can possibly believe about people, and to love one's neighbor as oneself. After all, would you want an unwanted and unnecessary immunization forced on you?

And why was an executive order necessary. Well, it wasn't. The issue was already before the Texas legislature. Of course, the pharmaceutical company that makes the vaccine, Merck and Co., has made donations to various Texas lawmakers and to a group called Women in Government, an organization that has lobbied heavily in several states for mandatory HPV vaccinations. Well, Texas has just become the first to mandate these unnecessary vaccines, which are also intrusions into the private lives and personal freedoms of every little girl and every family with children in their state. And in my opinion, this push for these mandatory vaccines is not to protect the public health, as it is clearly better to push for abstinence until marriage and fidelity within marriage. This push is clearly for profit, and the Holy Word of God has already told us that when someone loves money, they will do anything to get it. I believe that includes "Pier Sixing" our children's health in order to get the money that pays for whatever manifold sins that they are already involved in, or want to be involved in, which take so much money to pay for.

But there is another factor involved in the push to speed things up. A rival company, GlaxoSmithKline, is close to releasing a similar drug, which would create competition for Merck. Merck simply wants to corner the market and make their money before the other guy can cut into their profits.

It is not money, but the love of money, that is a root of all kinds of evil, and the love of money in this sorry case in Texas is clearly a root of the evil order just handed down by that state's chief executive. This is just another example of why we, the people of this country, should prefer only Christians who act and vote like Christians to rule over us. I'm just glad that I don't have a daughter who hasn't yet made it past the sixth grade in Texas. If I did, I'd be looking for a job in some other state, where, hopefully, the best possible things are believed about my children and about the rest of my family, and not the worst.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Byram Incorporation and Bad Politics

Originally published on Dec. 11, 2006 at http://www.onlinebyram.com.

In the December 2006 edition of The Byram Banner, the Byram "Interim Board of Aldermen" wrote within a long column concerning our bid for incorporation, "All of the interim aldermen are not in the incorporation area." The poor English used in this statement leaves one to wonder whether some of the "aldermen" are in and some are out, or whether all of them are outside of the incorporation area. If they all end up outside of the incorporation area, then I would say that's good news, and I would only hope that our "interim mayor" ends up outside the incorporation area, too.

But this is not the most disturbing part of their article, by far. The most disturbing part is the part in which the person writing for the "aldermen" writes about how Byram will have numerous churches with large acreages as if that's a bad thing because churches are exempt from paying taxes. I was warned as a student at Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary's Northern Orange County Campus back in the 1990s that there might be, in the future, some people who love money so much and are so devoid of understanding of what's really important that they would actually seek to abuse the government's right of eminent domain to take away church property and lands and give them to businesses because the businesses would bring in more revenues to the city's tax base. That would be, of course, ignoring the value of Christianity to a city. I think that each of these "aldermen" calls himself a Christian, and the "mayor" probably would as well; yet they have a problem with churches having large acreages where businesses could be built and make more money. They've got their priorities backwards. Don't just listen to what people say; listen to what they really say, and look at what they do. One of the "aldermen" has already said on a blog that she didn't believe that morality had any part in the decision-making process of government officials. Well, excuse me, but every official action that a government official takes is either moral or immoral.

Now, the people of Byram aren't dumb. We are self-sufficient (meaning that we depend on God, and we also don't want to become dependent on the government; we want to do as much as we possibly can, with the help of God, for ourselves), and we can and will make Byram into a great place to live, given the opportunity. But opportunities don't just come by themselves. We've got to have good leaders who will be willing to make it happen. We need to elect a city government who will work for the good of all the citizens of the City of Byram, not just themselves and their friends, and we need to elect people who already understand what's truly important, not people who we have to try to teach or people who we have to beg to do what's right.

It seems to me that everything about the Byram incorporation is being manipulated, and the manipulators aren't talking -- or at least they're not telling us anything that they don't want for us to know. But "by their fruits you shall know them," and judging by their actions, they're up to no good.

If and when Byram ever gets to hold legitimate, free elections, and I mean free from manipulation, then we will have our chance to elect people who have the best interest of the people at heart. On the other hand, we can also elect people who only care about themselves. All of the candidates will say that they care about the people of Byram, but you had better take care to really get to know them and their views before you go to the ballot box. Otherwise, we the people could be taking what has the potential of being a golden opportunity and throwing it down the drain. On the other hand, we have, at the same time, a chance to make Byram a really wonderful place. The choice is up to us. Our children will either benefit from or be harmed by the choices that we make. God will also call us to account for what we do. There really is much at stake. As one of our Founders said so long ago, take care that you do not trifle with your vote, and give your children and grandchildren reason to curse you.

May God bless you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wearing Pajamas to School - What's Next?

 Originally published on Dec. 2, 2006 at http://www.onlinebyram.com.

Whose stupid idea was this? I was at a friend's house last night, and noticed on their bulletin board a note sent home from the teacher of one of their children who is in the first grade, instructing that on Thursday, December 14, 2006, their child is to wear "pajamas or a nightgown" to school. They claim that this will "enhance their study as they watch the movie Polar Express." This is at Gary Road Elementary School here in Byram, where I live!

Yes, the Hinds County School District, the same bunch of people who have changed our Christmas Holidays to "Winter Break," is at it again! What's next? Junior high and high schools having Lingerie Days? Do we want for our little girls to grow up to be like Britney Spears, or do we care whether they follow God? And don't we want for our sons to grow up to be godly men?

I'm totally disgusted at this point. Sounds like more of what Rush Limbaugh calls "No Child's Behind Left Alone." This is one reason why we home school our son. Maybe next they'll want to use our taxpayer dollars to put the Playboy Channel in all of our public schools, and hand the remote to the biggest troublemaker in the class. Our State Constitution still states that the Bible will never be taken out of the schools of our state. It's time we give a copy, not only to every student, but to every teacher and administrator, because they obviously desperately need to read and learn to obey it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Democrats Pulled It Off - With Some Help

 Originally published at http://www.onlinebyram.com on Nov. 8, 2006.

A hundred or so years ago, there were Republican newspapers, and there were Democrat newspapers. I think that was a good thing, since we human beings are imperfect and there is no truly unbiased reporting.

Then, at some point, the Democrats played a dirty trick on all of us. They used the post-World War I desire for world peace (by their own contrived definition meaning "the absense of conflict") to supposedly create a totally fair, completely unbiased, and unquestionably honest mass media empire. Note that word, "unquestionably."

Christian and conservative media were minimized. Only the ones with the liberal slant were deemed, by them, to be trustworthy. They vilified anyone and everyone who disagreed with their already-failed philosophy, while they treated their favorite people and organizations as if they were above reproach and as if we weren't allowed to even question their truthfulness.

Well, folks, they're still doing the same thing today. They never have gone away. There's still a mass market for what they pass off as news, although that market has been shrinking in recent years. But you've got to hand it to them. The liberals engaged in an all-out blitz this year, and it worked. With help from the mass media arm of the Democratic Party, they lied about Republicans, they copied Republicans (at least they did in Arizona), they lied to us about who they really are, they pretended to be conservative, and they held onto the knowledge of Republican scandals until October when they knew it could hurt Republican chances of winning, while at the same time minimizing Democrat scandals. And I'll say it again, even though they were wrong, their strategy worked.

Our human nature is such that we are still susceptible to sin even if we've given our lives to the Lord Jesus Christ and are trying to do good. We must be on our guard constantly, or else we'll fall into the snare of the enemy, and the outcome will be anything but good. And the poor souls who have never given their lives to the Lord are, oftentimes, like people in a lifeboat without any oars and in the middle of a storm, tossed about to and fro. We have the capacity to do tremendous good or horrendous evil, and in the election in which we just voted yesterday, I don't think that the majority of the people understood what the sorry results of the way they voted could turn out to be.

Then again, I think that the main reason why our side lost is because Republicans, when they had control of the White House and both houses of Congress, failed to do what they should have done. They didn't lead -- or at least not in the right direction. They shouldn't have waited until they thought it politically expedient to start working on stopping illegal immigration, but they did. President Bush shouldn't have appointed homosexuals to high-level government positions, but he has. None of them should have let the liberal mass media get away with outright lying about there not being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but they have. I could go on and on, but I won't.

What we've got to do right now, and I mean right now, is get ready for the elections that are in the near future. If I may use my home state of Mississippi as an example, we have statewide elections next year, and we'll be voting on every office from Governor to Justice Court Judge, and we had better start getting ready now.

Whoever we elect to the legislature next year will redraw the district lines after the next U.S. census, which will be in 2010, and those lines will include the boundary lines for our four U.S. Congressional Districts. Whoever we elect as Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and as our state legislators will either help protect us from the abuse of eminent domain or they'll let our homes and lands be taken by greedy developers and greedy municipal governments to be made into strip malls or whatever else they want to do with them.

Well, I could go on and on, and so could you, I'm sure. But please let me leave you with one closing thought. We should take every election seriously. We should vote, but we should prepare to vote long before Election Day rolls around again. You need to know that the qualifying deadline will be around March 1st. After that, we'll know who's running for what, and we'll have somewhere between three and five months to get to know them before the Primaries roll around. And we'd better get to know them, because so much of what affects our lives and the lives of our children, our extended families, and our neighbors depends on it. Pick whoever you believe are the best candidates. Give $10 or $20 to the campaign of your favorite one. And ask the Lord right now, "Are You calling me to run for something?" In some cases, the qualifications are much less than you might think.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Courts Don't Have the Right to Tell Legislatures What Laws to Make

 Originally published at http://www.onlinebyram.com on Nov. 1, 2006.

The New Jersey Supreme Court, just a few days ago, ordered their state's legislature to redefine marriage. And correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Massachusetts do the same thing not too long ago?

In this country, we have three branches of government, and the judicial branch is supposed to be the least powerful. The judiciary does not have the right to tell the legislative branch what laws to make. It's about time we rein in the "imperial" judiciary - again. When I say again, I mean that we've done it in the past.

In our history as a nation of people under God, we have impeached judges for things such as being drunk in public. Our forebears were right in their actions back then. And we need to realize that the usurpation of one branch of our government over another is far more serious even than public drunkeness. Passing new laws and amending the Constitution in attempts to control our out-of-control judges is definitely not the way we should go. The Founders of this great country provided in the Constitution itself the way in which we should go. Impeachment. There is no reason why our U.S. Representatives, who we elected, shouldn't impeach many of the judges currently in our federal courts, and there is also no reason why our U.S. Senators shouldn't convict them and remove them from office. And the same holds true for our state officials.

I suspect that many or most of them are being blackmailed, bribed, or threatened - or rewarded for their inaction and pretense. Well, we knew they weren't without sin when we elected them. If some of them would just confess and forsake their sins and turn to doing what's right, they just might find that the American people would forgive them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bennie Thompson

 Originally published at http://www.onlinebyram.com on Oct. 21, 2006.

Two nights ago, U.S. Rep Bennie Thompson, the Democrat "representing" us here in Byram and in 25 percent of the State of Mississippi, made an appearance on WAPT-TV 16 in Jackson in order to tell us some of the things that are important to him, and to give us some reasons why he thinks we ought to reelect him - again.

He told us in very plain language that he is a cut-and-run Democrat - that if his party gets control of the U.S. House of Representatives, that he is in favor of pulling all of our troops out of Iraq, which would result in the destablization of that nation and make it a haven for terrorists and a base from which they could - and most certainly would - attack us and other Western nations over and over again.

He told us very plainly that he would become the Chairman of the Homeland Security Committee. That's something that I don't particularly like to have to think about, but I do have to think about it. Not only would we have a liberal, cut-and-run Democrat in charge of Homeland Security in the U.S. House, but we would have Nancy Pelosi, who some like to call "San Fran Nan," ruling over the entire House of Representatives as Speaker of the House, and we would most likely have John Murtha, another cut-and-run Democrat, as second in command in the House. If you want to see examples of failed leadership in the style of Bill and Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and John Kerry, then Nancy Pelosi, John Murtha, and our own Bennie Thompson fit the bill.

In that Thursday night interview, Bennie Thompson excused his exit from the Agriculture Committee by saying that agriculture isn't the number one industry in Congressional District Two anymore anyway. It's gambling, according to him, and he said it as if it's a good thing. This very statement alone shows that he doesn't understand - or doesn't care - that gambling in Mississippi is nothing but government sponsored theft, if you ask me. A lot of people have to lose in order for just one person to win. It hurts the poor more than anyone else, since they make up the majority of the people who gamble, and ours is still one of the poorest congressional districts in the nation after 13 years of having Bennie Thompson as our "representative."

Representative Thompson's voting record in Congress over the past 13 years shows that he supports abortion, homosexuality, and gun control, that he wants to raise your taxes, and that he is against the brave men and women who serve in our military to protect you and me and our families. How the majority of the people who live in our district can call themselves Christians and yet reelect him is something that I just don't understand - nor do I want to understand it.

Our "Republican" candidate who is running against him, Yvonne Brown, Mayor of the tiny Delta town of Tchula, doesn't appear to be much better. She has said that her family and the Espy family have been friends for a long time. The Espy family is a family of liberal Democrats. Mike Espy held the Second District of Mississippi seat in Congress at one time, until he was appointed by Bill Clinton as Secretary of Agriculture, where he ended up resigning in disgrace over a scandal. His nephew, Chuck Espy, serves in Jackson as a state representative, and proved earlier this year that he couldn't defeat Thompson in the Democratic Primary Election. Since the Brown family is such close friends with the Espy family, I wonder just how "Republican" or how conservative Mayor Brown is.

When I contacted her asking what her views were, she simply said that they were probably pretty similar to mine. Well, I'm sorry, but that's just not specific enough for me. When she tells of her perceived accomplishments as Mayor of Tchula, she talks about how much money she has been able to get from the federal government to "improve" Tchula - over $5 million, but no mention of actually improving the town's economy so that they don't need government assistance, and not a word about where she stands on abortion, homosexuality, gun control, taxes and spending, the War Against Islamo-Facists, and many other issues that affect us all.

I most definitely will NOT be voting for Rep. Thompson, and I see no reason to vote for Mayor Brown, but there IS one thing that we can do to improve our congressional district in the not-too-distant future. Next year, in 2007, we can elect state representatives and state senators who will draw our boundary lines after the next census, which will be in 2010, so that they don't unfairly favor keeping Bennie Thompson in office. Now, 2007 is only 2-1/2 short months away, and the deadlines for candidates to qualify is very early in March. Time is short, and now is the time to start praying about for whom to vote, and maybe about whether you should be a candidate yourself. Don't stop with praying for a candidates, though. Find good ones, even if they don't live in your district, give money to their campaigns as you're able - even if it's only $10, and put one of their signs in your front yard. If we'll all do our part to help, it'll go a long way.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Byram Incorporation, Part III

 Published originally at http://www.onlinebyram.com on Oct. 14, 2006.

Those poor people who live in the areas where they had hoped to become a part of the new City of Byram but are now looking at the very real possibility of being annexed by Jackson -- very much against their will -- are angry, and rightfully so.

At one Thursday evening meeting of the "Byram Interim Board of Aldermen," at which the "Byram Interim Mayor" Nick Tremonte, and WAPT-TV 16, were also present -- a meeting which I sometimes like to call "The Big Fight" -- Mr. Tremonte promised those residents that he WOULD NOT sell them out to Jackson, but now, apparently, he, and others, have done just that.

It's just another reason why these pretenders to governmental power who call themselves our interim government must not be trusted as far as we can throw them, which isn't very far at all. And when we get to elect our REAL city leaders, and they run for those offices, which I think they will, we should throw them out of their pretend offices and never afford them the opportunity to do us any further harm.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Byram Incorporation, Part II

 Originally published on Oct. 12, 2006 at http://www.onlinebyram.com.

We in Byram may be on our way to becoming an incorporated city, but the attorneys for all involved must agree on boundary lines before the judge will release his opinion. There is a weekly meeting tonight of our "interim government" at Trinity Wesleyan Church on Siwell Road, and I look for a lot of people to be in attendance, possibly to include a news crew from WAPT-TV Channel 16, since they've covered some of the more important meetings in the past. It will be a meeting worth attending.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Byram Incorporation

 Originally published at http://www.onlinebyram.com on Oct. 11, 2006.

We've heard for the past two days that Byram is going to be a city again. That's great news for those of us who will be living within the Byram city limits; bad news for those who live within that four square miles that will be annexed by Jackson. Look for news on municipal elections, watch to see who runs for office, and whatever you do, please educate yourself on the candidates. It is crucial that we start off with a city government that will honor God. Values voters, please make sure that you're registered to vote, donate to the campaigns of worthy candidates, and please get out and vote!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Noise, Part II

 Originally published on Oct. 11, 2006 at http://www.onlinebyram.com.

A local television station reported last night that Jackson has passed a noise ordinance. It's about time, although it's not necessary, since we already had a state law against disturbing the peace. Now, if they'll only enforce it, then the entire City of Jackson will be so much better off. People will be able to relax more and enjoy peace and quiet in their own homes and yards, which they pay for.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Byram: Initiating Low Taxes and Controlling Spending

 Originally published at http://www.onlinebyram.com on Oct. 3, 2006.

If Byram incorporates, we will necessarily have to initiate a city tax. But, how high or how low will that tax be? It will all depend on whom we elect to our city government, and it should be people who will publicly commit to initiating low taxes and keeping them low, controlling spending, fiscal responsibility and accountability, and limited government.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Correlation Between Crime and Law Enforcement

 Originally published by James Broadwater at http://www.onlinebyram.com on Oct. 2, 2006.

There is a direct correlation between crime and whether all the laws are enforced.

In the last three years, Mazzio's Pizza, MacAllister's Deli, and Portabella's in Byram, MS have been robbed. Entire neighborhoods have been burglarized. At The Reserve of Byram Apartments, four vehicles have been stolen (in one night), and one apartment has been broken into. An off-duty police officer working as a security guard at what was then Winn-Dixie (now Vowell's Marketplace) was assaulted by a thug with a baseball bat. Etc. You get the picture.

Our Hinds County Sheriff's Office tries to locate and arrest these people, but you rarely ever see them stopping people for speeding, tailgating, cutting people off in traffic, wreckless driving, or running stop signs or red lights, and you NEVER see them arresting people for breaking the state law against disturbing the peace.

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was right when he implemented a policy of enforcing all the laws, not just some of them. He found that when the officers under his command arrested people for misdemeanors, they often found that those same people were wanted for more serious crimes. That's one thing from New York City that I wouldn't mind importing to Mississippi.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bring Back Christmas Vacation!

 Originally published by James Broadwater at http://www.onlinebyram.com on Sept. 29, 2006.

I was very offended when I found out that our Hinds County schools refer to the December/January vacation as a "Winter Break" rather than Christmas Vacation. What's next? The abolition of Easter?

The school board already says that the Easter Break can be used as make-up days if the kids have to miss due to bad weather or some other such event.

What would happen to us and to our children should all vestiges of Christianity were taken away? We need only to look at the former Soviet Union to find the answer.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Noise

 Originally published by James Broadwater at http://www.onlinebyram.com on Sept. 29, 2006.

Many of my fellow Christians seem to believe that the measure of their obedience to God is how much they're willing to tolerate. Well, they're wrong. Remember the Intolerable Acts? Our Founders believed that there were certain things that we weren't to tolerate, and they staked their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor on it.

Have you ever noticed that the word "nice" is not to be found anywhere in the Bible? We're commanded to be kind, etc. But "nice" means that you're willing to do anything to try to get people to like you, and that you're also willing to do anything to avoid their criticism and condemnation.

I think that too many of us have been far too "nice" for far too long, and I want for you to think about what it's gotten us.

President Bush tried to "reach across the aisle" to Democrats right after he became President, and in doing so, he let Ted Kennedy write an education bill. Now, would you want a person like Ted Kennedy having anything at all to do with your child? Not if you love your child. No wonder our schools are in the shape they're in.

What does all this have to do with noise? Well, I said that we've been far too nice for far too long. Really, we're called to expose evil to the light, to speak the truth in love, and to do justice. Such is the case with all this unnecessary noise that surrounds us every day. People are now playing, at very high decibel levels, "music" that's not fit for anything except for use in trying to extract information from suspected terrorists. Much of this "music" promotes, in explicit detail, such things as illicit sex, murder, rape, and even the murder of law enforcement officers. And the music itself is obviously designed to annoy most of the population.

But what do we do about it? Most people choose to ignore it and appease the offending parties. Well, let me ask you something. What did appeasing Hitler get the Allied powers before and during World War II?

I have a "neighbor" who plays this loud music. He doesn't care whether his neighbors like the music, he doesn't care whether it keeps us from concentrating on something important that might benefit someone other than ourselves, and he doesn't care whether he's keeping us awake at night, making it impossible to get our needed sleep so that we can do our jobs properly the next day. I guess he feels that he doesn't have to care. You see, he's on "public assistance," which, in his case, means that our elected government is stealing money out of our paychecks before we even get them, and giving a part of it to him for sitting on his front porch or in his car and doing nothing but making life miserable for his neighbors, who have acted in good faith toward him.

And what happens when we call the Hinds County Sheriff's Office? We are told that there is no noise ordinance in Hinds County, and that these people are allowed to play their excuse for music as loudly as they want, whenever they want, for as long as they want. Well, there is a state law against disturbing the peace. I contacted Justice Court Judge Bill Skinner, who also used to be a Jackson police officer, and whose father was murdered by a thug while serving as a police officer. Judge Skinner told me that the sheriff's office can arrest the offending parties IF THEY'RE WILLING TO DO SO. And therein lies the problem. I guess they're also concerned with being nice? The question is, do we need a nice guy to be our sheriff, whose main goal seems to be to prove that he can get reelected, or do we need a real man, whose main job is to ENFORCE THE LAW?

We should all remember that Sheriff Malcolm McMillin is up for reelection in 2007, and cast our vote based on who will enforce the law, not on who will promote tolerance.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »